Spain v. City of Cape Girardeau

484 S.W.2d 498 (1972)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Spain v. City of Cape Girardeau

Missouri Court of Appeals
484 S.W.2d 498 (1972)

Facts

In 1963 the city of Cape Girardeau (the city) (defendant) improved a street. After the improvement, the city added catch basins to collect water that now flowed through a pipe onto a residential property. At the time of the city’s improvements, the property was owned by Emory Lincecum, and the improvements caused water to flow into Lincecum’s basement. Lincecum sold his home to Earl and Wilma Spain (plaintiffs) in 1966 for about $12,500. Lincecum did not disclose the basement-water issue at the time of the sale. After discovering the issue, the Spains attempted to solve the problem by adding dirt, a wall, and a ditch, to no avail. The Spains then sued the city for nuisance. Earl testified that the market value of his home was diminished by $4,500, and the jury awarded the Spains $2,500. The city appealed, arguing among other things that because the water issue existed at the time of their purchase, the Spains could not maintain a nuisance action.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Simeone, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership