From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Spain v. France (Lac Lanoux Arbitration)
24 I.L.R. 101 (1956)
France (defendant) planned to construct a reservoir for the purpose of producing electricity at Lake Lanoux. A river running downstream from the lake led into Spain (plaintiff). In order to alleviate any water loss that Spain might suffer as a result of the reservoir’s construction, France offered to build an underground tunnel and supply the tunnel with water from other sources, a volume totaling the same amount that would be used in the reservoir plan. Spain challenged the plan, arguing that the plan violated the Treaty of Bayonne of 1866 (Treaty) between the countries in that France could not begin this kind of construction in the absence of a previous agreement between both countries. An arbitral tribunal was set up by France and Spain to address the issue.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.