Spain v. France (Lac Lanoux Arbitration)

12 R.I.A.A. 281 (Nov. 16, 1957), reprinted in 24 I.L.R. 101 (1957)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Spain v. France (Lac Lanoux Arbitration)

France–Spain Arbitral Tribunal
12 R.I.A.A. 281 (Nov. 16, 1957), reprinted in 24 I.L.R. 101 (1957)

Facts

France (defendant) planned to construct a reservoir for the purpose of producing electricity at Lake Lanoux. A river running downstream from the lake led into Spain (plaintiff). In order to alleviate any water loss that Spain might suffer as a result of the reservoir’s construction, France offered to build an underground tunnel and supply the tunnel with water from other sources, a volume totaling the same amount that would be used in the reservoir plan. Spain challenged the plan, arguing that the plan violated the Treaty of Bayonne of 1866 (Treaty) between the countries in that France could not begin this kind of construction in the absence of a previous agreement between both countries. An arbitral tribunal was set up by France and Spain to address the issue.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 734,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 734,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 734,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership