Spain v. France (Lac Lanoux Arbitration)
France–Spain Arbitral Tribunal
12 R.I.A.A. 281 (Nov. 16, 1957), reprinted in 24 I.L.R. 101 (1957)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
France (defendant) planned to construct a reservoir for the purpose of producing electricity at Lake Lanoux. A river running downstream from the lake led into Spain (plaintiff). In order to alleviate any water loss that Spain might suffer as a result of the reservoir’s construction, France offered to build an underground tunnel and supply the tunnel with water from other sources, a volume totaling the same amount that would be used in the reservoir plan. Spain challenged the plan, arguing that the plan violated the Treaty of Bayonne of 1866 (Treaty) between the countries in that France could not begin this kind of construction in the absence of a previous agreement between both countries. An arbitral tribunal was set up by France and Spain to address the issue.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.