Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Spano v. New York

United States Supreme Court
360 U.S. 315 (1959)


Facts

Spano (defendant), accompanied by his lawyer, turned himself in to the police a few days after he killed a man in a barroom brawl. Spano, 25, had no prior history with law enforcement, although he had a history of emotional instability. Spano’s attorney left him in police custody after advising him not to answer any questions. Numerous police officers began to interrogate Spano at about seven at night, and the questioning continued for almost eight straight hours. Spano repeatedly told the police he was not going to answer their questions and he made repeated requests for his attorney to be present, all of which were denied. Bruno, an old friend of Spano’s, and now a new police officer, was brought in to question Spano when the police could not get him to confess. Bruno played to Spano’s sympathies and explained that he would lose his job if he could not get Spano to confess. Bruno’s job was never in jeopardy. After four sessions with Spano, Bruno finally got him to confess and Spano answered the prosecutor’s leading questions. The trial court allowed the confession to be admitted into evidence, instructing the jury to consider it only if they believed it was made voluntarily.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Warren, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Concurrence (Stewart, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.