Sparks v. St. Paul Insurance Co.

495 A.2d 406 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sparks v. St. Paul Insurance Co.

New Jersey Supreme Court
495 A.2d 406 (1985)

RW

Facts

St. Paul Insurance Company (St. Paul) (defendant) insured Raymond Guarriello against legal-malpractice claims under a series of one-year, claims-made policies in force between late 1976 and early 1980, when St. Paul canceled Guarriello’s coverage for nonpayment of premiums. Unlike typical claims-made policies, St. Paul’s policies covered a lawyer only for malpractice events occurring and reported within the one-year duration of the policy. Any retroactive coverage was limited to years in which the lawyer was insured by St. Paul. In 1978, Guarriello represented John and Carolyn Sparks (plaintiffs) in a house sale that, due to Guarriello’s negligence, turned sour and gave rise to a lawsuit, for which the Sparks hired new counsel. Soon after taking on the case, the new counsel reported Guarriello’s negligence to St. Paul. The Sparks eventually lost the house-sale case, but they successfully sued Guarriello for malpractice and went on to sue for a declaratory judgment that St. Paul was liable for covering the malpractice-damages award. The trial court’s summary judgment for the Sparks was affirmed by an intermediate appellate court. St. Paul appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stein, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership