Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Sparrow v. Demonico

960 N.E.2d 296 (2011)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...

Sparrow v. Demonico

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

960 N.E.2d 296 (2011)

Sparrow v. Demonico

Facts

Frances Sparrow (plaintiff) filed suit against her sister and her sister’s estranged husband, Susan and David Demonico (defendants), seeking an order declaring Sparrow to have a one-half interest in a home and real property owned by the sisters’ deceased mother. Susan claimed that she and David were the sole owners of the family home after having lived in the house for several years and as reflected in a recorded deed. Prior to trial, Sparrow and the Demonicos engaged in voluntary mediation, which resulted in an agreement providing that the Demonicos would sell the family property and pay Sparrow $100,000 from the proceeds. Subsequently, Sparrow filed a motion to enforce the executed settlement agreement. At an evidentiary hearing on the motion, David testified that on the morning of the mediation, Susan had a mental breakdown and was slurring her words, became less coherent, and cried uncontrollably. David and Susan left mediation early as a result, but permitted their counsel to execute a settlement agreement on their behalf. Susan provided similar testimony and added that she had recently stopped taking her prescribed antidepressant medication. There were no other witnesses at the hearing, and no exhibits were admitted into evidence. The trial court denied Sparrow’s motion, concluding that Susan’s mental impairment prevented her from having the capacity to contract at the time the settlement agreement was executed. The trial court then granted the Demonicos’ motion for a directed verdict. Sparrow appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Duffly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,700 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership