Specialty Bakeries, Inc. v. RobHal, Inc.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
961 F. Supp. 822 (1997)

- Written by Emily Pokora, JD
Facts
Specialty Bakeries, Inc. (plaintiff) operated under the name Bagel Builders, a franchised bagel store. HalRob, Inc. and RobHal Management, Inc. (collectively, HalRob) (defendants) entered a franchise agreement with Bagel Builders and opened a bagel store in Broomall, Pennsylvania. The agreement included arbitration and noncompete provisions. The noncompete prevented competing stores from operating within four miles of HalRob’s store. Specialty Bakeries subsequently merged with Manhattan Bagel Company, Inc. (collectively, franchisor) (plaintiff). As a result, three preexisting, competing Manhattan Bagel locations were within the restricted four-mile radius. HalRob filed suit, seeking injunctive relief, requesting that the franchisor be permanently enjoined from associating with the competing bagel stores. The franchisor filed a petition to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), arguing that the arbitrator should resolve the dispute under the parties’ agreement. The trial court granted the franchisor’s petition and ordered the parties to proceed with arbitration. Through a motion for a preliminary injunction, the franchisor sought to enjoin HalRob’s injunction proceedings during arbitration. HalRob argued that the Anti-Injunction Act prevented the franchisor from interfering with its injunction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bartle, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.