Speech First, Inc. v. Cartwright

32 F.4th 1110 (2022)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Speech First, Inc. v. Cartwright

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
32 F.4th 1110 (2022)

Facts

The University of Central Florida (UCF), a public university, had policies prohibiting (1) discriminatory harassment and (2) bias-related incidents. Among other things, the discriminatory-harassment policy barred verbal or physical conduct that, based on the totality of the circumstances, used religious, political, or genetic affiliation to “unreasonably” alter another student’s “participation” in a university program or activity. The policy also prohibited students from condoning, encouraging, or failing to intervene to stop the listed conduct. The bias-related-incident policy allowed anonymous complaints that a student had engaged in “hate or bias” conduct, which was defined as “offensive” conduct that, even if legal and unintentional, was directed at others based on characteristics such as religious, political, or genetic affiliation. A task force, the Just Knights Response Team, responded to bias complaints, coordinating interventions with affected parties if necessary. Three UCF students refrained from expressing their political and religious viewpoints on campus, concerned that expressing their arguably unpopular views would violate one or both policies. The withheld statements included: abortion was immoral, the government should not force religious organizations to recognize all marriages, affirmative action was unfair, a man could not become a woman by feeling like one, and illegal immigration was dangerous. The students belonged to Speech First, Inc. (plaintiff), an organization concerned with students’ free-speech rights. Speech First sued UCF’s president, Alexander Cartwright, and another UCF official (defendants) in federal district court, alleging that both policies violated the First Amendment. Speech First requested a preliminary injunction preventing UCF from enforcing the policies during the lawsuit. Relying on the Tinker standard, which evaluates whether a speech restriction is needed to prevent substantial disruption of school operations, the district court denied the injunction. Speech First appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Newsom, J.)

Concurrence (Marcus, J.)

Concurrence (Story, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership