Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Speiser v. Baker

Delaware Court of Chancery
525 A.2d 1001 (Del. Ch. 1987)


Facts

Health Chem (Chem) is a Delaware corporation. The public holds 40 percent of Chem’s stock, Marvin Speiser (plaintiff) 10 percent, Leon Baker (defendant) 8 percent, and Health Med Corporation (Med) (defendant) 42 percent. Chem owns Medallion Corp. (Medallion), which owns 95 percent of Med’s equity in convertible preferred stock, representing 9 percent of the voting power. Medallion can convert its preferred stock to common any time, which would give it 95 percent voting power. After conversion, Med would be barred by Delaware law from voting. Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 160(c). Speiser and Baker each own 50 percent of Med’s common stock. Speiser and Baker are Med’s only directors. Because of this circular ownership structure, Speiser and Baker have effective control of Chem, though they own less than 35 percent of the company. Speiser and Baker’s relationship turned sour, and Baker refused to attend Med’s shareholder meetings. Without Baker, the company’s quorum requirement was not met. Speiser sued to force an annual meeting. Baker answered with a mingled counterclaim and affirmative defense, arguing that no meeting should be convened because Speiser would take control of Med in breach of fiduciary duties owed to other shareholders. Baker asked for a declaratory judgment that Med cannot vote its Chem shares. Speiser moved to dismiss Baker’s counterclaim.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Allen, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.