Spencer Trask Software v. RPost International

383 F. Supp. 2d 428 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Spencer Trask Software v. RPost International

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
383 F. Supp. 2d 428 (2003)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Spencer Trask Software and Information Services, LLC, along with a related entity (collectively, Spencer) (plaintiffs) were experienced venture-capital investors. In July 2001, RPost International Ltd. (RPost) (defendant) circulated an offering memorandum seeking to raise up to $2 million in exchange for the issuance of convertible debt. RPost was a startup Internet company that sought to provide a registered electronic-mail service. The July memorandum stated that RPost was neither offering nor accepting any sales terms until a definitive, written agreement was executed. In August 2001, Spencer met twice with founders of RPost, and the parties orally manifested their assent to a financing deal in which Spencer would contribute $500,000 in Series B financing, subject to due diligence; multiple milestones would occur in Series C and Series D rounds of financing; and Spencer could periodically acquire RPost’s stock, up to more than 20 percent (August deal). The August deal was documented in four draft letters, each of which provided blank lines for the agreement date. Spencer also emailed RPost that Spencer was eager to consummate the financing “following the execution” of the letter agreements. The letters were never signed or executed. In November 2001, Spencer invested $500,000 in RPost and received a promissory note in return; the parties signed a debt agreement relating to the $500,000 amount. Spencer continued trying to complete due diligence on RPost, which eventually refused to comply with the parties’ August deal. Spencer sued RPost for breach of contract, among other claims, based on RPost’s failure to perform under the August deal. RPost filed a motion to dismiss.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Leisure, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership