Spinozzi v. ITT Sheraton Corp.

174 F.3d 842 (1999)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Spinozzi v. ITT Sheraton Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
174 F.3d 842 (1999)

SC

Facts

Thomas Spinozzi (plaintiff), a resident of Illinois, stayed in Acapulco, Mexico at a hotel owned by ITT Sheraton Corporation (defendant), a Mexican corporation. One night when the lights were out, Spinozzi fell into a maintenance pit at the hotel and suffered serious injuries. Although Sheraton was negligent, Spinozzi was also negligent in not staying on marked pathways at the hotel. Spinozzi sued Sheraton in federal district court in Illinois. Mexican law followed the doctrine of contributory negligence, under which a plaintiff’s negligence was a complete bar to recovery. Illinois had abandoned contributory negligence in favor of the doctrine of comparative negligence, under which a plaintiff could be negligent and still recover. Sheraton filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that, under Mexican law, Spinozzi’s claim was barred by his contributory negligence. The district court, applying Mexican law because Mexico had the most significant relationship to the alleged tort, granted Sheraton’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Spinozzi’s claim was barred due to his contributory negligence. Spinozzi appealed, arguing that because contributory negligence was contrary to Illinois public policy, the court should not apply Mexican law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 736,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership