Spireas v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

T.C. Memo. 2016-163 (2016)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Spireas v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo. 2016-163 (2016)

Facts

Spiridon Spireas (plaintiff) owned, jointly or individually, numerous patents related to the liquisolid technology that was useful in the manufacture of drugs. Spireas and a colleague granted Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. (Mutual) a license to use the liquisolid technology for the development of new drug products that would later be unanimously selected by the parties and, after such selection, produced and sold in the United States (1998 license). At the time, Spireas was also collaborating with other pharmaceutical companies to develop formulations using the liquisolid technology and planned to explore the use of the technology in the field of nutritional supplements. Thus, the 1998 license denied Mutual the right to use the technology with respect to products that Spireas and his colleagues were developing or were in negotiations to develop with other parties outside the pharmaceutical industry. In March 2000, the parties signed an engagement letter stating that they had selected three drugs for development. On his federal income tax returns, Spireas reported royalty income received from Mutual as long-term capital gain. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) issued a notice of deficiency to Spireas after determining that the royalties should have been reported as ordinary income. Spireas appealed the IRS’s determination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lauber, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership