Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins

136 S.Ct. 1540, 578 U.S. 330 (2016)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins

United States Supreme Court
136 S.Ct. 1540, 578 U.S. 330 (2016)

SC
Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins

Facts

Spokeo, Inc. (defendant), operated a website that allowed users to search for a person and that returned information about the person culled from databases and other sources. Someone performed a Spokeo search for Thomas Robins (plaintiff) that returned incorrect information. Robins became aware of the inaccuracy and filed a class action suit against Spokeo in the United States District Court for the Central District of California under the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970. The act required consumer reporting agencies to adopt certain procedures to ensure the accuracy of their reports. Spokeo argued that Robins did not have standing because he was not injured in fact. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that Robins did have standing. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Alito, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership