Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
United States Supreme Court
136 S.Ct. 1540, 578 U.S. 330 (2016)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Spokeo, Inc. (defendant), operated a website that allowed users to search for a person and that returned information about the person culled from databases and other sources. Someone performed a Spokeo search for Thomas Robins (plaintiff) that returned incorrect information. Robins became aware of the inaccuracy and filed a class action suit against Spokeo in the United States District Court for the Central District of California under the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970. The act required consumer reporting agencies to adopt certain procedures to ensure the accuracy of their reports. Spokeo argued that Robins did not have standing because he was not injured in fact. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that Robins did have standing. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alito, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.