Sportfame of Ohio, Inc. v. Wilson Sporting Goods, Co. (In re Sportfame of Ohio, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio
40 B.R. 47 (1984)
- Written by Philip Glass, JD
Facts
For 10 years, the wholesaler Wilson Sporting Goods Company (Wilson) (defendant) profitably shipped goods to the retailer Sportfame of Ohio, Inc. (Sportfame) (plaintiff), to the benefit of both parties. Sportfame voluntarily petitioned for Chapter 11 reorganization on February 14, 1983. Not long before Sportfame filed under Chapter 11, Wilson had discontinued shipments of sporting goods to Sportfame, as Sportfame fell into arrears. Around March and April of 1983, Wilson learned of Sportfame’s Chapter 11 petition and demanded that Sportfame either immediately satisfy its debts with Wilson or provide Wilson a plan for the future satisfaction of Sportfame’s debts. Otherwise, Wilson would continue to refuse to ship goods to Sportfame, causing Sportfame to incur business losses. In response, Sportfame moved for a permanent injunction against Wilson, contending that 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(6) forbade Wilson’s collection attempts. Wilson alleged that it was not making a collection attempt. The issue came before the bankruptcy court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Krasniewski, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.