Supreme Court of Massachusetts
100 N.E. 622 (1913)
Kimball (defendant) owned real estate and divided it into lots according to a subdivision plan. Sprague (plaintiff) purchased four lots and part of a fifth lot under deeds that imposed setback requirements for construction on the lots. Kimball retained ownership of part of the fifth lot and later sold it to Grossman without incorporating the setback restrictions into the deed. The deed to Grossman incorporated the subdivision plan by reference, but the plan itself contained no reference to any setback restrictions. Sprague filed suit to enjoin Kimball’s sale to Grossman without imposing the same restrictions that affected Sprague’s lots. Sprague argued that reliance on the applicability of the restrictions to all the lots in the subdivision served as an inducement to Sprague’s purchase from Kimball and that equity demanded that Kimball impose the same restrictions upon the purchaser of the land retained by Kimball. The trial court concluded that any agreement by Kimball to subject the retained property to the same restrictions amounted only to an oral agreement. Because the statute of frauds required the conveyance of any interest in real property to be memorialized in writing, the trial court concluded as a matter of law that Kimball’s oral agreement to subject the retained property to use restrictions was unenforceable. The trial court dismissed Sprague’s complaint. Sprague appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Braley, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.