Spring Branch Independent School District v. OW
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
961 F.3d 781 (2020)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
OW (plaintiff) was a child in the Spring Branch Independent School District (district) (defendant). OW exhibited severe behavioral issues and attended private school through the fourth grade. OW continued to have behavioral issues but returned to the district for fifth grade. OW’s family met with the district about OW’s issues and provided a letter from OW’s psychiatrist recommending Rehabilitation Act accommodations. Throughout the school year, OW drew violent and disturbing images, used offensive language, and threw objects during classes. OW’s family met frequently with the school’s principal and provided recommendations, but OW’s daily behavior continued to be violent and inappropriate. The district and OW’s family created a behavior intervention plan for OW, but the plan had minimal impact. At the start of the second semester, OW assaulted two school staff members. After these incidents and three months after the behavior plan was created, the district referred OW for a special education evaluation. OW was transferred to a district specialty program and put into a private school tutoring program. OW’s family pulled OW from the district and enrolled him in the private school full-time, but OW was eventually expelled and sent to a residential school. OW’s family filed an administrative complaint against the school district, seeking reimbursement for OW’s private school tuition and other relief. The hearing officer found that the district violated its Child Find obligation under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) by failing to timely evaluate OW for special education services. The district appealed to a federal trial court, which affirmed the hearing officer’s decision and found that an expedited evaluation of OW should have occurred. The district appealed to the Fifth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.