Spruance v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
60 T.C. 141 (1973)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Preston Spruance (plaintiff) and Margaret Spruance entered into two agreements that, read together, operated as the couple’s property-settlement agreement for their divorce. The combined divorce agreement provided that Preston would transfer approximately $1 million in stock into a trust for Margaret and the couple’s four children. The trust’s income would be used to provide support and maintenance for Margaret and the three children who were still minors. After Margaret and Preston both died, the trust’s remainder would be distributed to all four children. The commissioner of Internal Revenue (defendant) determined that $450,000 of Preston’s $1 million transfer was not attributable to the support and maintenance payments. Rather, this amount was a direct property transfer to the four children, who would receive the property outright when their parents died. Preston did not contest the calculations. However, Preston petitioned for a determination that the entire $1 million transfer was not a gift because it was made pursuant to a divorce agreement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dawson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.