Spurr v. Spurr
Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi Supreme Court
No. 17-287-APP, Nottawaseppi Huron Band Sup. LEXIS 6 (2018)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Nathaniel Spurr (plaintiff) lived within the Pine Creek Reservation, which was a reservation within the Indian country of the Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi. Nathaniel’s stepmother, Joy Spurr (defendant), was a non-Indian who lived in the Detroit area, outside the boundaries of Nottawaseppi Huron Band Indian country. Joy initiated several unwanted contacts with Nathaniel, sometimes entering tribal lands to engage Nathaniel directly. She also contacted tribal officials and employees, both on and off the reservation. Nathaniel obtained a protection order against Joy in the Nottawaseppi Huron Band tribal court. Joy appealed to the tribal supreme court, arguing that the tribal court lacked jurisdiction to issue the protection order against her because (1) she was a non-Indian who did not live in the tribe’s Indian country and (2) the complained-of events occurred mostly outside tribal territory.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

