St. Clair v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
140 S.W.3d 510 (2004)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Michael St. Clair (defendant) was convicted of two murders in Oklahoma. In September 1991, while awaiting sentencing, St. Clair escaped from jail. St. Clair was eventually caught and was charged with murdering Frances Brady in Kentucky while he was on the run. Final judgments for the Oklahoma murders were not entered until November 1991, after the Brady murder. The jury convicted St. Clair of the Brady murder and found aggravating circumstances based on the Oklahoma murders. As a result, St. Clair was sentenced to death based on a Kentucky law that included a prior record of conviction for murder as an aggravating circumstance for the crime of murder. St. Clair appealed, arguing that he did not have a prior record of conviction for murder because final judgments for the Oklahoma murders had not yet been entered at the time of the Brady murder.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Waller, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Keller, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.