St. Clair v. Commonwealth

140 S.W.3d 510 (2004)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

St. Clair v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court
140 S.W.3d 510 (2004)

SC

Facts

Michael St. Clair (defendant) was convicted of two murders in Oklahoma. In September 1991, while awaiting sentencing, St. Clair escaped from jail. St. Clair was eventually caught and was charged with murdering Frances Brady in Kentucky while he was on the run. Final judgments for the Oklahoma murders were not entered until November 1991, after the Brady murder. The jury convicted St. Clair of the Brady murder and found aggravating circumstances based on the Oklahoma murders. As a result, St. Clair was sentenced to death based on a Kentucky law that included a prior record of conviction for murder as an aggravating circumstance for the crime of murder. St. Clair appealed, arguing that he did not have a prior record of conviction for murder because final judgments for the Oklahoma murders had not yet been entered at the time of the Brady murder.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Waller, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Keller, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership