St. Francis de Sales Federal Credit Union v. Sun Insurance Co. of New York

818 A.2d 995 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

St. Francis de Sales Federal Credit Union v. Sun Insurance Co. of New York

Maine Supreme Judicial Court
818 A.2d 995 (2002)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

St. Francis de Sales Federal Credit Union and other credit unions (the credit unions) (plaintiffs) received deposits of checks and contracted with Maine Armored Car (Maine) to transport the checks for processing. A lock box was installed on an exterior wall of the St. Francis de Sales Federal Credit Union building, and the credit unions deposited checks into the box each day for pickup by Maine. Maine purchased an armored-car transportation-insurance policy through Sun Insurance Company of New York (Sun) (defendant). The policy excluded losses arising from theft from the lock box unless a master key, dial rim-lock key, guard key, or combination was used. Annual certificates of insurance were issued to the credit unions through an insurance broker verifying that Sun had issued an insurance policy to Maine. The certificates stated that the policy covered liability for loss or damage from any cause whatsoever to property of customers and did not mention any exclusions relating to theft. A thief broke into the lock box and stole checks. Maine submitted a claim, but Sun denied coverage because access to the lock box was not gained through one of the designated keys. The credit unions were unable to collect judgments recovered against Maine and sued Sun, claiming that the representations in Sun’s certificates upon which the credit unions had relied were fraudulent. The jury found for the credit unions. Sun maintained that there was insufficient evidence of fraud and that Sun was entitled to judgments as a matter of law. The court denied Sun’s motions for judgments as a matter of law. Sun appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Clifford, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership