St. Joseph Equipment v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.

546 F. Supp. 1245 (1982)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

St. Joseph Equipment v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.

United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
546 F. Supp. 1245 (1982)

RW

Facts

Beginning in 1958, Massey-Ferguson, Inc. (M-F) (defendant), a manufacturer of construction equipment and other machinery, granted St. Joseph Equipment (St. Joseph) (plaintiff) a license to deal in M-F construction equipment. By 1978, M-F was losing money on its line of construction equipment. The manufacturer gave all its dealers notice that it was pulling out of the construction-equipment business. St. Joseph sued M-F for violating the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law (WFDL) and for failing to give adequate notice. The WFDL’s stated purposes were to promote the public interest in fair dealings between dealers and grantors, and to protect dealers against unfair treatment by grantors. One way in which the WFDL attempted to achieve these purposes was to prohibit a grantor from terminating or changing the fair competitive circumstances of a dealership agreement without good cause and requisite notice. M-F moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Evans, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership