Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

St. Jude Medical v. Medtronic

536 N.W.2d 24 (1995)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

St. Jude Medical v. Medtronic

Minnesota Court of Appeals

536 N.W.2d 24 (1995)

Facts

Electromedics (defendant) began accepting bids to purchase the company. Among the bidders were St. Jude Medical (plaintiff) and Medtronic (defendant). St. Jude and Electromedics negotiated a merger agreement that included a $3 million termination fee to be paid to St. Jude if the merger did not close. Subsequent to this agreement, Medtronic increased its bid for Electromedics. St. Jude matched the increased bid, and Medtronic increased its bid again. Electromedics ultimately accepted Medtronic’s bid, selling for $97 million, $11 million more than it would have absent Medtronic’s two increased bids. Neither Electromedics nor Medtronic paid the termination fee to St. Jude. St. Jude sued Medtronic for payment of the fee. The trial court applied a liquidated-damages standard and found the fee to be an unenforceable penalty. The court granted Medtronic summary judgment. St. Jude appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Huspeni, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership