Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks

509 U.S. 502 (1993)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks

United States Supreme Court

509 U.S. 502 (1993)

Facts

Melvin Hicks (plaintiff), a Black man, worked for St. Mary’s Honor Center (St. Mary’s) (defendant). He was promoted from correctional officer to a supervisory position as a shift commander. After several disciplinary actions, Hicks was discharged from his position. Hicks brought suit against St. Mary’s under Title VII, alleging that he was discharged on the basis of his race. At trial, Hicks established a prima facie case of racial discrimination, thereby creating a presumption that St. Mary’s intentionally discriminated against Hicks based on his race. St. Mary’s offered evidence that Hicks was discharged for legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons to rebut the presumption. Specifically, St. Mary’s pointed to Hicks’s numerous rule violations. The district court judge, acting as the fact-finder, found that the reasons given by St. Mary’s were not credible. However, the court ultimately found for St. Mary’s because Hicks failed to meet his burden of proof and show that race was the determining factor for his discharge. On appeal, the Eighth Circuit reversed and remanded the district court’s decision. It held that the finding that St. Mary’s reasons for discharging Hicks were mere pretexts entitled Hicks to judgment as a matter of law because the presumption of discrimination had not been rebutted. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 606,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership