Stacy Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation
Illinois Supreme Court
129 N.E. 3d 1197 (Ill. 2019)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
An Illinois law, the Biometric Information Privacy Act (act), placed restrictions on how businesses could collect, retain, and disclose individuals’ biometric information, including fingerprints, retina scans, and face recognition. The act stated that any party aggrieved by the act had a private right of action against the offending entity. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (Six Flags) (defendant) sold re-entry passes to park patrons and used their fingerprints as part of the re-entry process. In order to issue a season pass to Alexander Rosenbach, the minor son of Stacy Rosenbach (plaintiff), Six Flags took Alexander’s fingerprints when he was at the park for a school field trip. Six Flags did not inform Rosenbach that it was going to take Alexander’s fingerprints and did not disclose its practices with respect to any fingerprints so taken. Also, Six Flags did not have a written policy on how it maintained patrons’ fingerprints. Rosenbach sued Six Flags, asserting a violation of the act. Six Flags argued that under the act, a plaintiff must prove some damages beyond a mere violation of the law. An interlocutory appeal was filed to the appellate court, and the appellate court agreed with Six Flags. Rosenbach appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Karmeier, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.