Stambovsky v. Ackley
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
169 A.D.2d 254 (1991)
- Written by Rocco Sainato, JD
Facts
Jeffrey Stambovsky (plaintiff) entered into a contract for the purchase of a home in Nyack, New York, with Helen Ackley (defendant). Prior to the purchase, Stambovsky conducted the required home inspection and searched the public records regarding title. However, unbeknownst to Stambovsky, Ackley had held the house out to the public as a haunted house. An article had been written about the home in Reader’s Digest, and the home was included on a haunted-homes tour of Nyack. Ackley did not disclose these facts to Stambovsky during their negotiations. Upon learning of the home’s reputation as being haunted, Stambovsky brought an action against Ackley to rescind the sales contract for the home. The trial court dismissed the complaint, stating that no remedy at law was available. Stambovsky appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rubin, J.)
Dissent (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
