Stanford v. Kentucky
United States Supreme Court
492 U.S. 361 (1989)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
The court considered two consolidated cases. In the first case, 17-year-old Kevin Stanford (defendant) robbed a gas station and repeatedly raped and sodomized the attendant before murdering her. In the second case, 16-year-old Heath Wilkins (defendant) robbed a convenience store and murdered one of the store’s owners. Stanford and Wilkins were convicted and sentenced to death. Stanford and Wilkins, along with several amici, argued that the imposition of the death penalty on 16- and 17-year-olds is cruel and unusual punishment. In support of their argument, they offered evidence that prosecutors and juries are reluctant to impose the death penalty on young offenders; that legislatures often set 18 as the minimum age to vote, drink alcohol, or drive; and that 16- and 17-year-olds are not psychologically or emotionally developed enough to be deterred by the death penalty. Stanford’s conviction was affirmed in the Kentucky Supreme Court; Wilkins’s conviction was affirmed in the Missouri Supreme Court. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.