Stange Company v. Commissioner

36 T.C.M. 31 (1977)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Stange Company v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
36 T.C.M. 31 (1977)

Facts

G. F. DeCoursin, Mark Duce, and Norris Adams acquired 51 percent of the stock in Media Graphics, Inc. (MGI), a commercial-photography business. Meanwhile, DeCoursin and Duce were the sole shareholders in April Corporation, which was formed in 1966 to acquire the assets of Jem Foods, a bankrupt company specializing in flour products. Although Jem Foods had previously served multiple clients, it reached a point at which Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) was its sole customer, and many KFC franchisees were increasingly unhappy with the flour product—a source of concern for April’s management. A reorganization was planned and executed in 1968. All MGI shareholders exchanged their MGI stock for April stock, and April transferred its assets and liabilities to MGI. April continued to exist as a holding company. MGI served as the operating company for the businesses previously owned by both MGI and April. MGI had net operating losses that were preserved in the reorganization and reported as a carryover for the fiscal years ending August 31, 1968, and August 31, 1969. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (defendant) disallowed the deductions, reasoning that the reorganization’s underlying purpose had been to gain the benefit of MGI’s net operating losses. MGI’s successor, Stange Company (plaintiff), challenged the deficiency in the United States Tax Court. Stange argued that the reorganization had several purposes, including (1) supplying capital to MGI, (2) streamlining the administration of two business entities, (3) providing diversity of investment, and (4) creating a vehicle for future acquisitions and diversification.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scott, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership