Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Stanley v. Illinois

405 U.S. 645 (1972)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...

Stanley v. Illinois

United States Supreme Court

405 U.S. 645 (1972)

Play video

Facts

Peter Stanley (defendant) and Joan Stanley never married but lived together on and off and had three children over an 18-year period. When Joan Stanley died, the state of Illinois (plaintiff) instituted a dependency proceeding. Under Illinois law, an unmarried father was presumed to be an unfit parent. Upon the state’s showing of the father’s unwed status, the children were taken from his custody and declared wards of the state. An unwed father was not entitled to a hearing on his fitness as a parent. In contrast, all married parents, divorced parents, and unwed mothers were entitled to a hearing before the state removed their children from custody. As a result of the dependency proceeding, Stanley’s children were taken from his custody and declared wards of the state. He appealed, contending that the process violated his rights to equal protection and due process. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 34,000 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership