United States Supreme Court
405 U.S. 645 (1972)
Peter Stanley (defendant) and Joan Stanley never married but lived together on and off and had three children over an 18-year period. When Joan Stanley died, the state of Illinois (plaintiff) instituted a dependency proceeding. Under Illinois law, an unmarried father was presumed to be an unfit parent. Upon the state’s showing of the father’s unwed status, the children were taken from his custody and declared wards of the state. An unwed father was not entitled to a hearing on his fitness as a parent. In contrast, all married parents, divorced parents, and unwed mothers were entitled to a hearing before the state removed their children from custody. As a result of the dependency proceeding, Stanley’s children were taken from his custody and declared wards of the state. He appealed, contending that the process violated his rights to equal protection and due process. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 237,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.