Illinois Appellate Court
53 N.E.2d 22 (1944)
In May of 1942, Stanmeyer (plaintiff) rented a piece of property to Davis (defendant). Stanmeyer verbally leased the premises to Davis for $500 per month “for the duration of the war and until automobiles are again produced” and “until [Davis] receives twenty-five automobiles in any one month.” In November 1942, Stanmeyer served notice on Davis terminating the lease at the end of December 1942. When Davis did not return possession of the premises, Stanmeyer sued to recover possession. Stanmeyer argued that a term lease must have a definite and certain time at which it begins and ends. Because the parties’ oral agreement did not identify a specific time period or termination date, Davis’s tenancy was a tenancy at will that Stanmeyer could terminate at any time. The trial court agreed, ruling that the lease agreement was a tenancy at will. Davis appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Matchett, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.