Logourl black

Starr v. Fordham

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
648 N.E.2d 1261 (1995)


Ian Starr (plaintiff) was a partner in the law firm Fordham & Starrett (F&S) (defendant) from the firm’s founding in March 1985 to December 31, 1986. F&S’s partnership agreement gave Laurence Fordham and Loyd Starrett (the founding partners) (defendants) the authority to determine each partner’s share of the firm’s annual profits. For the year 1985, the founding partners divided the profits equally. In 1986, however, Starr was awarded only 6.3 percent of the profits, while the founding partners and others received substantially larger shares. Starr sued F&S and the founding partners, alleging that they had breached their fiduciary duty to him as well as the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The trial court found that Starr had billed roughly 15 percent of the firm’s total billable hours, more than double the percentage of profits he received. The court further determined that the founding partners had deliberately selected criteria for profit distribution in order to minimize Starr’s share. The court therefore ruled in Starr’s favor and awarded him over $75,000 in damages from lost profits. The founding partners appealed, arguing that the trial court improperly assigned them the burden to demonstrate fairness; that the business judgment rule shielded their decision; and that the ruling that they violated their fiduciary duty and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing was clearly erroneous.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Nolan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 91,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,498 briefs - keyed to 168 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now