State Analysis, Inc. v. American Financial Services Assoc.

621 F. Supp. 2d 309 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State Analysis, Inc. v. American Financial Services Assoc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
621 F. Supp. 2d 309 (2009)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

State Analysis, Inc. (StateScape) (plaintiff) owned and operated a searchable, proprietary, and copyrighted database of bills and regulations. StateScape’s software downloaded legislation, and StateScape’s employees examined and catalogued the legislation for customers. StateScape sold access to its database on a subscription basis, and customers received a unique username and password. From 1998 through 2008, American Financial Services Association (AFSA) (defendant) had a contractual subscription to StateScape’s database. Under the contract terms, AFSA could provide StateScape access to AFSA’s member businesses, and each member then received a unique username and password. Kimbell Sherman Ellis (KSE) (defendant) was a government-relations firm located in Montpelier, Vermont. KSE had a one-year subscription to StateScape between 1999 and 2000. Thereafter, KSE became a competitor of StateScape with a database product called FOCUS. In 2003, KSE hired two former StateScape employees, a former marketing director and a former researcher. In 2008, AFSA informed StateScape that it planned to switch to KSE’s product. StateScape then conducted a forensic analysis and discovered that, from about 2004 to 2008, StateScape’s database had been accessed 735 times from a computer in Montpelier, Vermont, using three usernames associated with AFSA employees who worked in Washington, D.C. KSE had never been a member of AFSA. StateScape also discovered that KSE had prepared a number of materials and bill summaries for AFSA that looked markedly similar to StateScape’s content. StateScape believed that KSE had wrongfully accessed its database and copied StateScape’s copyrighted materials. StateScape sued AFSA and KSE alleging numerous claims, including copyright infringement, violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), and violation of Virginia’s Computer Crimes Act (CCA). AFSA and KSE filed motions to dismiss.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brinkema, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership