State ex rel. Angel Fire Home and Land Owners Association, Inc. v. South Central Colfax County Special Hospital District
New Mexico Court of Appeals
797 P.2d 285 (1990)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
New Mexico’s Special Hospital District Act (the act) permitted the creation of special hospital districts. The act required that the districts be compact and contiguous. If a district was to span more than one county, the act required the independent approval of the inhabitants of each county, each of which was called a subdistrict. Further, the act required that districts benefit their inhabitants. Finally, the act prohibited the creation of a district that would include an area already in a district. Pursuant to the act, the South Central Colfax County Special Hospital District (the district) (defendant) was created. The district encompassed multiple school districts within Colfax County, including Moreno Valley. Landowners in Moreno Valley (landowners) (plaintiffs) sued the district, claiming that the creation of the district was unconstitutional because it placed an unfair tax burden on them. Specifically, the landowners claimed that their community amounted to one-fourth of the population covered by the district but provided one-half of the tax base. Further, the landowners asserted that there was a hospital closer to them than the new district hospital would be, meaning that they would gain no benefit from the district. The district court ruled in the landowners’ favor, finding that the act was unconstitutional. The district appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hartz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.