State ex rel. Barno v. Crestwood Board of Education

731 N.E.2d 701 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State ex rel. Barno v. Crestwood Board of Education

Ohio Court of Appeals
731 N.E.2d 701 (1998)

Facts

Jennifer Barno (plaintiff) was a senior at a vocational public high school overseen by the Maplewood JVS Board of Education (board) (defendant). The board had enacted an attendance policy denying academic credit to students with 13 or more absences. Barno successfully completed her school’s curriculum, passing all her state tests and earning a 3.966 out of 4.0 grade point average. Barno had 18.5 absences her senior year, 16.5 of which had been deemed excused. Barno’s principal informed Barno that, because Barno had more than 13 absences, Barno would not graduate. Barno filed a form seeking reconsideration due to extenuating circumstances to a reinstatement committee. Neither the form nor any publication furnished to Barno defined what would constitute extenuating circumstances. The committee declined to find extenuating circumstances, and Barno filed an appeal for reconsideration, which the committee denied. Barno then filed an action in state court seeking judicial review of the board’s decision to deny Barno her high school diploma. The trial court ruled against Barno, and Barno appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nader, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership