State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dept.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
47 P.3d 859 (2002)
- Written by Brittany Frankel, JD
Facts
Patricia H. (defendant) was Elizabeth’s mother. Upon Patricia’s request, when Elizabeth was only four and a half years old, the Children, Youth & Families Department (CYFD) (plaintiff) took custody of Elizabeth. Elizabeth was a rebellious child, required highly skilled parenting, and had been taken care of poorly by Patricia. Patricia was having a difficult time and was battling serious illnesses, including a thyroid disorder and breast cancer. At the time CYFD took initial custody of Elizabeth, the court entered a stipulation, which is an agreement between parties as to a relevant issue within a legal proceeding. The contents of a stipulation may serve as the basis for a judicial ruling without the court’s weighing evidence relating to the stipulated issue. Initially, Patricia had scheduled visits with Elizabeth, but the visits did not go well. Nine months after CYFD took custody of Elizabeth, the court held a permanency hearing. At the hearing, the court determined that Elizabeth should stay with CYFD, but she should eventually return home to Patricia. The court held a second permanency hearing a few months later, and the court ordered CYFD to continue implementing Patricia’s treatment plan. Sometime later, after Elizabeth had been in CYFD custody for two and a half years, the district court held a hearing and terminated Patricia’s parental rights to Elizabeth. Patricia appealed, alleging that CYFD did not make reasonable efforts to assist her in curing the issues that caused her to neglect Elizabeth.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bosson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.