State ex rel. Crowley v. District Court
Montana Supreme Court
108 Mont. 89, 88 P.2d 23 (1939)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
John Crowley (plaintiff) created a diversion point on the Madison River to appropriate water for irrigation of his land. The diversion point was reasonably adequate and efficient for its intended purpose when Crowley created the diversion. In the mid-1930s, Montana Power Company (MPC) (defendant) used dams to impound water for its operations, which, at various times, completely changed the natural flow of water in the river to the extent that Crowley’s diversion point was no longer operative. Crowley sued MPC based on its interference with Crowley’s senior appropriative water rights. MPC filed a demurrer, seeking to dismiss Crowley’s claims, asserting that MPC allowed sufficient water flow from which Crowley could draw his water appropriation and that it was up to Crowley to adjust his methods if necessary to reach and divert that water. The Montana district court sustained the demurrer. Crowley sought a writ from the Montana Supreme Court for supervisory control over the district court and directing the district court to overrule the demurrer.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.