State ex rel. Lemon v. Gale
Nebraska Supreme Court
721 N.W.2d 347 (2006)

- Written by Joe Cox, JD
Facts
Greg Lemon was a Nebraska resident who wished to place three ballot initiatives on the 2006 Nebraska general election ballot. One measure, the 3 Casinos Initiative, would have allowed a casino in each of Nebraska’s three congressional districts. Another, the K-12 Initiative, would have directed the tax proceeds from casino gambling mostly toward K-12 education. The third initiative was withdrawn. Nebraska Secretary of State John Gale (defendant) refused to process the petitions for the initiatives, finding that each initiative violated a Nebraska Constitution provision stating that the same matter, either in form or substance, could not be submitted by petition more often than once every three years. Gale asserted that substantially similar measures had been placed on the ballot in 2004, which mandated that they be excluded from voting in 2006. The 2004 initiative regarding casinos would have allowed previously barred legalized games of chance, including those utilized by casinos. The 2004 initiative regarding taxation of gambling was approved and directed taxation of games of chance at casinos and other locations. After the 2006 initiatives were rejected, Lemon filed suit, and the trial court found that the K-12 Initiative was barred by the resubmission language but that the 3 Casinos Initiative was not barred. Both parties appealed. At issue was whether the resubmission rule was reserved for instances of two nearly identical initiatives being offered with synonymous language, as Lemon argued. On the other hand, Gale argued that the inquiry should consider the substance of the proposed initiatives and should more broadly bar anything on the same essential subject from reconsideration. Lemon also argued that allowing the bar to resubmission would violate the First Amendment by burdening his freedom of speech and political association by giving the state too much administrative discretion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.