State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Watkins

461 P.3d 174 (2019)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Watkins

Oklahoma Supreme Court
461 P.3d 174 (2019)

KD

Facts

Chris Chaney hired attorney Brandon Watkins (defendant) after Chaney’s wife, Jeannie, died in a car accident. At the time of her death, Jeannie had one adult child and two minor children. Chaney was entitled to one-half of Jeannie’s estate, and her children were entitled to one-sixth each. The matter ultimately settled for $100,000. Watkins deposited the settlement funds into his client trust account in June 2014. After some delay, Watkins paid Chaney and Jeannie’s adult child out of the settlement proceeds. In June 2015, Chaney terminated Watkins. Although Chaney asked Watkins to pay the remaining heirs, Watkins did not do so. In November 2016, Chaney filed a grievance against Watkins with the Oklahoma Bar Association (bar) (plaintiff), at which time Watkins still had not paid Jeannie’s minor children the settlement proceeds to which they were entitled. Watkins never set up separate trust accounts for the minor children. Between July 2014 and February 2017, Watkins made numerous withdrawals and payments from his client trust account, including paying two loans on which he was the debtor and repeatedly transferring money to his personal account. Following an investigation, the bar filed a formal complaint charging Watkins with professional misconduct. Among other things, the bar alleged that Watkins converted or misappropriated client funds when he failed to timely pay the heirs. The bar further alleged that Watkins committed client neglect by, among other things, failing to return phone calls and failing to set up separate trust accounts for the minor heirs as required by Oklahoma law. A trial panel found, by clear and convincing evidence, that Watkins had misappropriated funds and was neglectful. The trial panel recommended a suspension of two years and one day. The matter then came before the Oklahoma Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Darby, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership