From our private database of 35,800+ case briefs...
State Ex Rel. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Kortum
Nebraska Supreme Court
559 N.W.2d 496 (1997)
Attorney Steve Smith of the firm Van Steenberg, Chaloupka, Mullin, Holyoke, Pahlke, Smith, Snyder, and Hofmeister, P.C. (Van Steenberg) defended Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart) (plaintiff) in four personal-injury matters that all occurred at the Scottsbluff, Nebraska, Wal-Mart store. One case concerned plaintiff Pottorff, who injured herself when she slipped and fell on the store’s floor. During Smith’s representation of Wal-Mart in the Pottorff matter, Smith had access to the Wal-Mart property, staff, manuals, and other information. Around the same time as the Pottorff litigation, Debra Holden fell in the parking lot of the Scottsbluff Wal-Mart store and injured herself. Two years after the Pottorff matter concluded, Tylor Petitt (defendant) of Van Steenberg represented Holden against Wal-Mart. Holden and Pottorff both alleged negligence and failure to warn. Wal-Mart defended both cases on the grounds of contributory negligence and assumption of the risk. Wal-Mart filed a motion to disqualify Petitt from the Holden matter, and the trial court denied the motion. Wal-Mart sought a writ of mandamus instructing the trial court to vacate its order denying the motion. The Nebraska Supreme Court appointed a special master to compile recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law. The special master found that Smith received no confidential information during his representation of Wal-Mart. Nevertheless, the special master recommended that the supreme court issue the writ because the nexus between the Pottorff and Holden cases was too close to avoid the appearance of impropriety.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Connolly, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 620,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 620,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.