State ex rel. Whetsel v. Wood
Oklahoma Supreme Court
207 Okla. 193, 248 P.2d 612 (1952)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Using its police power, the State of Oklahoma enacted the Watchmaking Act (the act), which regulated and required licensure to engage in the trade of watchmaking. An applicant for licensure was required to register as an apprentice with the Oklahoma Board of Examiners in Watchmaking (the board) and complete a four-year apprenticeship under the supervision of a licensed watchmaker. A county attorney general (the state) (plaintiff) sued Thomas Wood, Jr. (defendant), alleging that Wood was an unlicensed watchmaker and had to be restrained from engaging in watchmaking for the protection of the public. Wood demurred, arguing that the act unconstitutionally deprived him of his rights and property. The trial court ruled in Wood’s favor. The state appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Halley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.