State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka

474 N.W.2d 324 (1991)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka

Minnesota Supreme Court
474 N.W.2d 324 (1991)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD

Facts

In the early morning, Stephen Kintop, the ex-boyfriend of Colleen Hughes, burst into her living room, brandishing a pistol. Paul Peterson (defendant), an acquaintance of Kintop who was dating Hughes, was standing in the living room. Peterson fled through the backdoor and ran into the street. Kintop ran after Peterson, shooting him several times. Peterson was wounded in the hip and head. Kintop then shot and killed himself. Peterson then sued James Wicka, special administrator for the estate of Stephen Kintop (defendant). Kintop had been covered under his parents’ State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (State Farm) (plaintiff) homeowner’s insurance plan. State Farm brought a summary-judgment action, seeking a ruling that the intentional-act exclusion in the policy precluded coverage. The trial court found in favor of State Farm, and Peterson appealed. The appellate court reversed the grant of summary judgment, holding that if mental illness made Kintop unable to control his conduct, the intentional-act exclusion did not apply, but there was a genuine question of material fact as to Kintop’s mental capacity. The Minnesota Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gardebring, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership