State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. City of Lakewood
Colorado Supreme Court
788 P.2d 808 (1990)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Donald Lawhead and others (the petitioners) filed a petition to organize a 230-acre tract of land as a special district (the district) within the City of Lakewood (defendant). The petitioners owned undeveloped land within the district. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and other opponents of the petition (the opponents) (plaintiffs) owned developed property within the district. The Lakewood city council published notice of the petition in the newspaper and held a public hearing although the special-district statute did not require a hearing. The statute did contain certain requirements and allowances, such as a requirement of a certain number of signatures to file a special-district petition, the ability of opponents to a petition to exclude their specific properties from the special district, and a final vote of the affected residents to ratify the city council’s decision. Ultimately, Lakewood approved the petition. The opponents appealed the approval in state court, arguing that their procedural-due-process rights were violated because not all opponents received notice of the petition and hearing. The opponents also claimed that their substantive-due-process rights were violated because the special-district statute did not contain explicit standards governing the city council’s review of the petition. The district court upheld the approval of the petition. The opponents appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rovira, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.