From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. K.A.W.
Florida Supreme Court
575 So.2d 630 (1991)
Following a car accident, David Wilkerson and his wife and daughter retained the law firm of Sheldon Schlesinger (defendant), bringing suit against insurers State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (plaintiff), Interstate Fire Casualty Company (plaintiff) and Continental Casualty Company (plaintiff). The Wilkersons filed a separate malpractice suit against healthcare providers who treated their daughter’s injuries, in which they were also represented by the Schlesinger firm. After the Schlesinger firm determined that David’s negligence may have played a part in the accident, David fired the firm as his counsel in the personal injury action. Mrs. Wilkerson and her daughter then amended the complaint to add David as a defendant. The Schlesinger firm continued as Mrs. Wilkerson’s counsel, and David consented to be sued up to his insurance-coverage limit. As the parties who would be liable for damages assessed against David, the insurance companies moved to disqualify the Schlesinger firm from the personal injury suit, contending that the firm could potentially use confidential information learned during its representation of David, against him. David filed an affidavit consenting to the firm’s representation of his wife and daughter. The trial court declined to disqualify the firm, concluding that the insurance companies lacked standing to request disqualification considering David’s consent, and that they failed to prove that they would be prejudiced were the firm not disqualified. The court of appeal denied the insurance companies’ petitions for writ of certiorari. The companies appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Grimes, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.