State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Davies

310 S.E.2d 167 (1983)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Davies

Virginia Supreme Court
310 S.E.2d 167 (1983)

  • Written by Genan Zilkha, JD
Play video

Facts

Dixie Davies (plaintiff) was injured when the car she was driving collided with a car driven by Patricia Ann Turner. Turner was insured by a State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) (defendant) policy. Davies was insured by a Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) (defendant) policy. The GEICO policy had a standard provision for uninsured motorist coverage. David sued Turner for personal injuries. Turner delivered the complaint to State Farm. At trial, Turner failed to appear. State Farm defended the action but reserved its rights. A $10,725 verdict and judgment was entered against Turner. This judgment remained unpaid. As a result, Davies initiated a declaratory-judgment proceeding to determine if either GEICO or State Farm were liable for her damages. State Farm disclaimed liability because, it claimed, Turner’s failure to appear at trial constituted a breach of the cooperation clause of the State Farm policy. GEICO defended the suit because, it claimed, State Farm’s disclaimer of liability was not effective, and, as a result, Turner was not uninsured. After a hearing was held, the trial court determined that State Farm had not been prejudiced by Turner’s failure to appear at trial. The trial court entered judgment against State Farm and in favor of Davies. The trial court dismissed GEICO from the action. State Farm appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Carrico, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 777,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership