State Industries v. Mor-Flo Industries
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
883 F.2d 1573 (1989)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
State Industries, Inc. (plaintiff) held a patent on a method of insulating water heaters with foam. State Industries brought suit against Mor-Flo Industries, Inc. and its subsidiary, American Appliance Manufacturing Corporation (collectively, Mor-Flo) (defendant) for infringement of the patent, seeking damages for lost profits and a reasonable royalty. State Industries established that it had a 40-percent nationwide market share and that it had the ability to ship and sell enough water heaters to fulfill its market share of the sales made by Mor-Flo. This was not disputed by Mor-Flo. The federal district court found that Mor-Flo had infringed the patent. The court assessed damages at 40 percent of Mor-Flo’s infringing sales plus a reasonable royalty of 3 percent on the remainder of Mor-Flo's sales. Mor-Flo appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mayer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.