State National Bank of Big Spring v. Lew
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
795 F.3d 48 (2015)
- Written by Tanya Munson, JD
Facts
Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) in response to the 2008 to 2009 financial crisis. The Dodd-Frank Act granted the treasury, the federal reserve, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) the authority to liquidate failing financial companies that posed a risk to the financial stability of the United States. This was called orderly liquidation authority. The government had the power to use its orderly liquidation authority to change the priority of a financial company’s creditors to increase the company’s assets or minimize its losses. State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, and a group of states (the states) (plaintiffs) challenged the constitutionality of the orderly liquidation authority in district court and argued that the government’s power to alter the priority of creditors was unconstitutional under the Bankruptcy Clause’s guarantee of uniform bankruptcy laws and nondelegation and due process. The states claimed to have standing because they had invested in financial companies and were, therefore, potential creditors in possible future liquidations or reorganizations of those financial companies and, because the government’s orderly liquidation authority could deprive the states of the uniform treatment they were entitled to, the states’ current assets were worth less than they otherwise would have been. The district court disagreed with the states, finding that the states lacked standing to challenge the government’s orderly liquidation authority and that the claim was not ripe.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kavanaugh, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.