State National Insurance Co. Inc. v. Yates
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
391 F.3d 577 (2004)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Calvin Yates (defendant), a Mississippi logger, was sued by a landowner for wrongfully cutting down her trees. Yates sought coverage from his liability insurer, State National Insurance Company (State National) (plaintiff), a Texas citizen. State National denied coverage and filed a diversity action in federal court, seeking a declaratory judgment that Yates’s policy did not provide coverage. Yates counterclaimed for breach of contract and bad faith. Yates also asserted claims against Bruce Insurance Agency (Bruce) (defendant), the Mississippi insurance agency that sold him State National’s policy, for professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation. Yates then moved to dismiss, arguing that Bruce was a necessary and indispensable party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19, whose joinder would destroy subject-matter jurisdiction. The district court agreed and dismissed the case. State National appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Higginbotham, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

