State National Insurance Co. Inc. v. Yates

391 F.3d 577 (2004)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State National Insurance Co. Inc. v. Yates

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
391 F.3d 577 (2004)

Facts

Calvin Yates (defendant), a Mississippi logger, was sued by a landowner for wrongfully cutting down her trees. Yates sought coverage from his liability insurer, State National Insurance Company (State National) (plaintiff), a Texas citizen. State National denied coverage and filed a diversity action in federal court, seeking a declaratory judgment that Yates’s policy did not provide coverage. Yates counterclaimed for breach of contract and bad faith. Yates also asserted claims against Bruce Insurance Agency (Bruce) (defendant), the Mississippi insurance agency that sold him State National’s policy, for professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation. Yates then moved to dismiss, arguing that Bruce was a necessary and indispensable party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19, whose joinder would destroy subject-matter jurisdiction. The district court agreed and dismissed the case. State National appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Higginbotham, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership