State of Alabama v. State of Texas
United States Supreme Court
347 U.S. 950 (1954)
- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Alabama (plaintiff) challenged the constitutionality of the Submerged Lands Act of 1953. The act purported to convey to states “the lands beneath navigable waters” and the “natural resources within such land and waters” within their borders, but retained for the United States the power to regulate those waters for “commerce, navigation, national defense, and international affairs.” A coastal state’s borders extended at least three miles into the ocean. Alabama argued that the act was unfair and resulted in a loss of national security.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Concurrence (Reed, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
Dissent (Black, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.