State of Alaska, Department of Revenue v. Amoco Production Company

676 P.2d 595 (1984)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State of Alaska, Department of Revenue v. Amoco Production Company

Alaska Supreme Court
676 P.2d 595 (1984)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Amoco Production Company (Amoco) (plaintiff), a subsidiary of Standard Oil Company of Indiana, was incorporated in Delaware. Amoco did business in Alaska exploring for and producing oil and gas. Alaska adopted the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (the act) in 1959. The act provided a three-factor apportionment formula for states to use to apportion the income of a multistate business for tax purposes. One of the factors was the property factor, which was the fraction of the value of the multistate business’s property that was used in the taxing state. In calculating the property factor to use for the apportionment of Amoco’s income, the Alaska Department of Revenue (the department) (defendant) included the value of Amoco’s leaseholds in Alaska that were not producing gas or oil. Amoco appealed to the state superior court, arguing that the nonproducing leaseholds should not be included in the property factor of the apportionment formula because the leaseholds were not being used as required by the act. The superior court reversed the department, holding that the nonproducing leaseholds could not be included in the property factor. The department appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Burke, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership