State of California v. Continental Insurance Co.
California Supreme Court
55 Cal. 4th 186, 145 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1, 281 P.3d 1000 (2012)
- Written by Sheryl McGrath, JD
Facts
The State of California (California) (plaintiff) operated the Stringfellow industrial waste disposal site for nearly 20 years. Several insurance companies, including Continental Insurance Co., (collectively, the insurance companies) (defendants) provided California with comprehensive general liability (CGL) insurance. The insurance contracts contained provisions known as all-sums provisions that required the companies to pay “all sums which the Insured shall become obligated to pay by reason of liability imposed by law . . . .” The policies contained limits of the amount of money the insurance company must pay for the “ultimate net loss [of] each occurrence.” In turn, the policies defined occurrence as “an accident or continuous or repeated exposure to conditions which result in . . . damage to property during the policy period.” A federal court ordered California to conduct a cleanup of property damage at the site that had accumulated over decades, known as long-tail property damage. California sued the insurance companies in state court for indemnification of the cleanup costs. The state trial court held that California could not aggregate—or stack—multiple policies to cover the entire cleanup cost. On appeal, the intermediate appellate court reversed the trial court on the stacking issue. The appellate court held that California could stack the policies to cover the cleanup costs. The insurance companies appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.