State of Georgia v. McAfee
Georgia Supreme Court
385 S.E.2d 651 (1989)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
A motorcycle accident in 1985 left Larry McAfee (plaintiff) a quadriplegic dependent on a respirator with no medical likelihood of improvement. McAfee remained a competent adult and wanted to turn off the respirator to end his life. McAfee discussed the matter with family members, who supported his decision. With an engineer’s help, McAfee devised a timer switch that would allow him to shut off his respirator himself. McAfee tried to disconnect the respirator, but the pain of not being able to breathe prevented him from succeeding. McAfee petitioned in county court to ask for a declaration allowing him to turn off his respirator and not have it restarted. McAfee also asked that a sedative be administered beforehand to relieve the pain and allow him to die peacefully and that the court declare whoever administered the sedative would not hold any liability. The county court granted McAfee’s petition, reasoning that his right to refuse medical treatment and to privacy and liberty under the federal and state constitutions outweighed any state interest in the proceeding. The court concluded that it could not order a sedative administered but that no civil or criminal liability would attach to the person who did so. The Georgia Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gregory, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.