State of Maryland v. Baltimore Transit Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
329 F.2d 738 (1964)
The State of Maryland and others (plaintiffs) sued the Baltimore Transit Company (defendant) in connection with an accident in which the company's bus struck and killed a man. Many witnesses testified during the trial. Their testimony conflicted sharply as to whether the decedent exercised due care at the time of the accident, or was contributorily negligent. The legal presumption was that the decedent acted with due care, but witnesses for the company testified that he did not. The trial judge instructed the jury that, in light of the conflicting evidence, they could not give weight to the due care presumption. The jury returned a verdict for the company, and Maryland appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bell, J.)
Dissent (Haynsworth, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.